RSQS AI / EvidenceClaims should remain traceable to proof
Evidence and provenance

Built, tested, deployed and proven are different states.

RSQS AI aims to preserve the evidence required to distinguish architectural intent from implementation, testing, deployment and independent verification.

Evidence object.

Consequential execution should leave a durable record of what was requested, what authority existed, what ran, what was tested and what remains uncertain.

REQUEST

Goal and authority

Requested outcome, governing purpose, jurisdiction, constraints, requesting authority and human gates.

EXECUTION

Capabilities and versions

Execution plan, capability dependencies, source versions, deployment targets and implementation lineage.

RESULT

Tests and artifacts

Test results, health checks, artifact hashes, generated outputs, observed limitations and failure states.

APPROVAL

Human decisions

Review, authorization, release acceptance and any human action required during execution.

PROVENANCE

Traceability

Timestamps, source references, evidence links, hashes and immutable identifiers connecting claims back to their basis.

UNCERTAINTY

Known unknowns

Uncertainty remains represented explicitly rather than being collapsed into success, safety or compliance.

Public proof register.

The public register is intended to expose verified capability claims without publishing unnecessary protected implementation details.

CapabilityClaim statePublic proof
RSQS AI institutional web surfaceLive / externally verifiedPublic HTTPS endpoint, governed Contabo deployment, external content verification.
Zenodo production adapterBuilt / governed workflowProduction-only endpoint restriction, identity validation, DOI preparation and explicit release confirmation.
Institutional publication pipelineIn integrationLaTeX source, PDF build, artifact hashing, Zenodo manifest and DOI linkage.
Evidence-led capability registerExpandingVersioned capability, deployment and evidence records exposed selectively through the public site.

Fail closed

No evidence is not evidence of safety, compliance, success or authority.

Where proof is absent, the public state should remain unverified or unknown. This is intended to prevent a growing institution from confusing repository existence, architectural descriptions or successful builds with demonstrated operational capability.